The design is claimed to be optimized for Internet Explorer and even though some HTML purists will no doubt deplore this, I find it hard to criticize Microsoft too much for this sin in the current climate on the Web. Use its budget and obvious avant-garde leanings to pioneer mainstream use of interactive cartoons along the lines of Mark Hurst's work at the Media Lab.Įven though the articles are too long for comfortable on-screen reading, their presentation is obviously designed for online viewing with liberal use of HTML tables to lay out multiple columns that look better on the screen than on a printout where they lead to excessive waste of paper. It would have been more interesting to see At 610 pixels wide by 849 pixels tall, only users with large monitors will be able to see all of the artwork. : much more compact (thinner glossy paper that is better bound than the output of my printer) and better cartoons.ĭoes have a comic strip but it is not well suited for the online medium: it is simply a scanned drawing that has been anti-aliased to a not-very-attractive three shades of gray. If I wanted to read long printed articles, I would be better off with Of course, users could simply print out articles, and the site does provide a printable version for download. In fact, often longer than the content warrants. Is not designed for online reading: the feature articles are all In fact, I have not read every last article in this issue since doing so would be too hard to endure. This review is based on early experience with the first issue of Is mainly a failure due to its inability to adjust to the online medium, though it sports several promising innovations and appropriate uses of the Web. Is Microsoft's new attempt at a "serious" online magazine edited by Michael Kinsley.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |